Saturday 23 July 2016

Ethical Dilemma #5 - Peninsula Farms

Week 5: Peninsula Farms 
 WEEK 5: PENINSULA FARMS 



Peninsula Farms was a small business in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, that began with one cow.  The Joneses owned the cow and kept her around to maintain their lawn.  The cow produced milk, of course, but the Joneses didn't know how to milk her.  So they learned proper milking techniques.  The cow was producing more milk than they could use, and the surplus was going to waste.  The Joneses researched the local market to find out what kind of milk product they would sell.  They discovered that whole-milk yogurt was in demand.  They then found out how to make yogurt in large batches.  They also studied the health and safety regulations to make sure they were meeting government standards.  The Joneses were so successful that they exceeded the government criteria.  The Joneses then bought more cows -- enough to make Peninsula Farms a profitable business.

Government inspectors had always given Peninsula Farms a high rating on their regular inspections.  It was a surprise to the Joneses, then, when six federal inspectors from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) visited the farm and, with just a cursory examination of the plant and its procedures, impounded more than $50 000 worth of yogurt.  This halted the production and left Peninsular Farms customers without product they wanted to buy.  The Joneses faced a total loss of more than $100 000 as they were now behind $50 000 worth of new production in addition to the yogurt that had been impounded.  (Their cooler was full of the impounded yogurt and there was nowhere to put any new yogurt.)  They were losing sales and customers as well.  The space that Peninsula Farms' product took on grocery shelves was soon filled with competing brands.  Faced with such a loss, Peninsula Farms was forced out of business.  It was discovered after the fact that their plant was above standard and their yogurt tested totally clean, with no trace of offending bacteria.

No one wants to be poisoned by the foods we eat.  The Canadian Inspection Agency does a wonderful job of protecting us from dirty factories, unsafe packaging, and dangerous storage practices.  As a result, we eat foods that do not, as a rule, make us sick.  Canadians are grateful that the CIFA is diligent in their efforts on our behalf.  However, in this case, do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?
Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?
If you were the Joneses, would you start over?  Explain your decision.



****Please read the article below before answering this post****



Idealism and yogurt

    New York professor of Spanish literature and management consultant find niche market making yogurt in rural Nova Scotia

Published: The Globe and Mail, August 14, 1989, Report on Business
By Deborah Jones

    Ask Sonia Jones what makes an entrepreneur tick, and she will wax poetic about the main character in Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra's seventeenth-century masterpiece Don Quixote de la Mancha. ''I love his willingness to go forth and tackle every problem,'' said the practical-looking Ms Jones, chairman and chief executive of Peninsula Farms Ltd. of Lunenburg, N.S., a maker of all-natural yogurt, frozen yogurt and ice cream.

    Don Quixote, an adventurous country gentleman addled with idealism, ''wanted his life to be useful to others: orphans, widows in need, damsels,'' she enthused.

    What have such altruistic notions to do with running a business such as Peninsula Farms , which employs 42 and sells $2.7-million worth of dairy products in the three Maritime provinces each year?

    ''The love of living and learning and helping and doing is part of the entrepreneurial spirit,'' Ms Jones said.

    She and her husband, Gordon Jones, were well-to-do New Yorkers when they moved to Nova Scotia in 1972 in search of an academic job for her and uncrowded sailing room for him. Ms Jones, a Harvard-trained professor of Spanish literature, found a job at Dalhousie University. The pair eventually settled with their two small daughters on a farm in pastoral Lunenburg on Nova Scotia's south shore.

    Starting a new business was the furthest thing from their minds. Ms Jones was happily teaching students about her first love and specialty, Cervantes. Mr. Jones had left the corporate world far behind when he retired as a management consultant.

    But then Daisy came along, and Peninsula Farms - the tale of which Ms Jones has set out in her book It All Began With Daisy - inadvertently began.

    Daisy was a Jersey cow the family acquired to have a supply of milk. However, she produced far too much milk for them to use. Ms Jones began making yogurt from the excess and then, on the suggestion of a friend, started selling some to health food stores in Halifax.

    One day David Sobey, then president of Sobeys Stores Ltd., which operates a chain of supermarkets in the Atlantic region, came calling. He told Ms Jones that if she cared to produce her yogurt more commercially he would be willing to stock it. The couple considered the offer, and decided to take him up on it - on condition he allow them to expand lowly.

    Today, the Jones's products are sold throughout the region. Peninsula Farms yogurt holds a 25 per cent share of the Maritime yogurt market, Ms Jones said, and this year the company introduced all-natural ice cream.

    She has also written a yogurt cookbook, which went on sale this year, and is working on a proposal by a Nova Scotia film production company to turn her book about Daisy into a movie.

    Peninsula Farms has not been entirely a story of adventurous romance, the likes of which Cervantes would have relished. Although they now draw a healthy salary, the Jones's did not pay themselves for eight years and, at times, their personal possessions were used as collateral for business loans.

    Indeed, the company would not have endured ''if there hadn't been this spirit of adventure and this desire to live life in a vital way, and if we both hadn't enjoyed this whimsical adventure,'' Ms Jones said.

    She relishes the idea of being an entrepreneur and teaches a course in entrepreneurism at Acadia University in Wolfville, N.S., although she is not entirely convinced that an entrepreneurial spirit can be taught.

    ''Unless you have a sense of humor and a touch of whimsy and an incredible willingness to work yourself very hard, and you have a certain willingness to take risks, you're not likely, even if you want to be an entrepreneur, to pursue it to the end.'' Ironically, Ms Jones appreciates Nova Scotia precisely because it seems to have fewer born entrepreneurs than her native United States. ''I find myself really loving Nova Scotia because it isn't grubby-grabby. . . . You need a middle ground between California crass materialism or pure drudgery,'' she said.

    And what of Daisy, with whom it all began and whose likeness is part of the Peninsula Farm logo? The cow is probably in yogurt heaven now.

    In 1981, the Jones's sold their herd and began purchasing raw milk from Farmers co-operative dairy. Daisy, who would be about 18 years old now, was auctioned off as just one of many lot numbers.

    ''We lost track of Daisy. We didn't know she was going to be famous when we sold her,'' Ms Jones said ruefully.


Copyright Deborah Jones 1989

27 comments:

  1. Canadians are grateful that the CIFA is diligent in their efforts on our behalf. However, in this case, do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?
    Yes, I believe that the CIFA was too diligent in this case. I think this because as it said in the text, the examination that resulted in $50 000 worth of yogurt being impounded was not a very thorough or comprehensive one. Also, since the Joneses did regularly exceed the government regulations and never had any health and safety problems in the past I think that they acted a bit too fast and made a hasty decision based off of a cursory examination. However, by making a swift decision like this one they potentially could have saved a lot of people from getting sick, even though, in this case, the yogurt was fine maybe it’s good for them to be very precautious. On the other hand, being that hasty with important decisions can really harm a business like in this case. Therefore, I think that there must be a balance between being overly cautious and a bit more realistic.

    Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?
    No, I don’t believe that there should be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses. This is because I think that health and safety should always be put first, therefore, there shouldn’t be any businesses, no matter the size, getting special treatment. I realise that poor judgement could result in another situation like Peninsula Farms, however, isn’t potentially saving tonnes of people from getting sick worth more than the money that a business could have made if the error wasn’t found earlier? For example, if there had actually been something with the yogurt at Peninsula Farms at that examination but, they were still allowed to sell it until it was sure that something was wrong with it people would have become sick after eating the product and some may have been harmed badly. So, if that could have been the case I don't think it matters if a company cannot afford the interruption because health and safety is more important than money.

    If you were the Joneses, would you start over? Explain your decision.
    If I was the Joneses, I would not start over. This is because Sonia Joneses has a very good educational background as she attended Harvard which means she had the opportunity to get a job teaching Spanish literature which she loved while making money for her family. Also, Gordon Jones was already a retired management consultant, out of the corporate world and part of why the family moved to Nova Scotia was so that he could sail which he would have less time to do if he was part of running a business. Speaking of time, since the Joneses had two young daughters at the time, if they were to start over they wouldn’t be able to spend as much time with them. Although the extra income might have been nice it's also possible some people might think of them poorly still even though nothing was wrong with their product. However, I think that all in all it was a good thing to try but personally, I wouldn’t see it as a priority to start over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also agree that our standards should remain very high, but I think you are very casual about the severity of what happened to the Jones family. This was their livelihood and it was destroyed by the incompetence of the CFIA. All the they needed to do was complete their inspection faster and maybe the Jones' business may have survived. Timing and a lack of manpower were at fault, not the Jones family, therefore, they should not have suffered the consequences. If Canada can't support the millions of small businesses struggling to survive each year, then why are we even bothering to offer them hope for the future by encourage them to start up in the first place? If we want to provide small businesses any form of security, then we have to support them during an inspection and not place them in a no win situation.

      Delete
  2. Canadians are grateful that the CFIA is diligent in their efforts on our behalf. However, in this case, do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?
    Keeping the standards is essential for the public, making sure that products from Peninsula Farms reach the bar was totally appropriate. However, Peninsula Farms was not a large business, the impound cost might be too much for it to handle. $50,000 worth of yogurt was definitely too much for the company, especially most of their sales income was based on it. That quality check could be the turning point of the business. It was good to see the company remained its high standard but kept reminding the managers not to lose their standards was necessary. I don’t believe the CFIA was too diligent because maintaining the quality was their main focus, but their method didn’t fit all cases.

    Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?
    I think rules should apply to all businesses because food safety is prior to all other aspects. The standards should be there no matter the scale. However, CFIA can adapt different procedures when encountering different situations. For instance, when CFIA is working with a small-scale business such as Peninsula Farms, the Agency could reduce the impound cost based on a certain ratio, or they could pick a certain amount of yogurt from each batch randomly. These procedures could also inspect the quality while posing less pressure to small-scale businesses which normally don’t have a lot of money.

    If you were the Joneses, would you start over? Explain your decision.
    If I were the Joneses, I would start over. Having made yogurt for a long time and brought the business to its peak, the Joneses have enough experience and financial support to do it again. Although the former business collapsed, it must have gained enough reputation among the public to make it happen. The only “threat” to it could be CFIA. The family could also re-organize and review their former legacy to figure out what could be improved before restarting the business. The gap time and enough experience they’d gained were enough for another success.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to disagree with your opinion regarding supporting the Jones' option to start over. The threat that the CFIA could repeat the tragedy isn't a small one and at this point nothing has changed with respect to the rules to give the Jones' confidence that they won't be faced with a repeat scenario. Since they were not at fault, nothing can really be done to give them the reassurance that it won't happen again. Therefore, moving on is their only option to protect themselves from complete financial ruin. Even if they do have the experience, there is no guarantee that people will purchase their product now that CFIA has tarnished their image. Doubt has been cast over them and the CFIA is to blame. Compensation from the CFIA to the Jones family is the only option in supporting their recovery and a future in a new venture.

      Delete
    2. What you discussed about the Joneses restarting their business is a good point especially since they would now have some experience. Do you think that if they did start over, the business would continue to grow at the same rate as it had before they were forced out of business?

      Delete
    3. I have to disagree with your opinion supporting that the Joneses should´ve start over. I believe that it was hard for them being forced out of the business and losing a lot of money but, do you think that it would've been easy for them to start over? Do you think they had enough money to start over? And also I believe that after all of that the had a bad reputation and they would not have the same success as before.

      Delete
    4. I completely agree with your opinion on adapting to the situation with the CIFA rules. Reducing the penalty is very much needed with some businesses. But I also like how you believe that there should be set standard no matter the business. Great points!

      Delete
    5. I strongly agree with your idea to restart the company as it was and still is a reputable business with high demand. Future precautions will be made to maintain healthy and safe products and to avoid another tussle with the CIFA.

      Delete
  3. Do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?

    Even though I am very grateful that the Canadian food inspection agency helps keep the food we eat safe $50 000 worth of yogurt being impounded which would eventually result in a loss of $100 000 and Peninsula Farms forced out of business is over the top. The Canadian food inspection agency went too far in this case. With some of the bigger company’s this amount of impounded yogurt would have been fine but since the Peninsula Farms were just growing they weren’t ready for this and a company that sold what eventually turned out to have an above average cleanness was forced out of business.

    Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?

    Yes, I believe there should be special rules for smaller and growing companies. I feel like the not as well know small companies are the ones that are more likely to have traces of bacteria in their food so I’m not saying that the Canadian food inspection agency shouldn’t inspect smaller company’s but maybe not impound as much as their product. Smaller businesses should be visited more frequently but should not have $50 000 worth of product impounded. This way the Canadian food inspection agency can be sure that the food is safe and the growing business can keep on growing.

    If you were the Joneses, would you start over?  Explain your decision.

    In this case if I was the Joneses I do not think I would start over. After working so hard to start a business than having it pulled away it would be heart breaking and along with losing the business they lost all the money the business would have made. Also in the text it says “Faced with such a loss, Peninsula Farms was forced out of business” so it sounds like they lost to much money due to the impounding and had to lose the company as well, so I believe in this case even if the joneses wanted to start over I do not think that they would be able to due to money, but who knows since they started the first business with only one cow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your statement, I agree that if I was the Joneses I would not start over. I think that it was really hard for them losing all of their money and being forced out of the business after working so hard. I believe that they were very lucky from the beginning that they started a huge business from only one cow. What do you think they did to keep moving forward with their lives if they didn´t have Peninsula Farms? Do you think they wanted to start over with the business?

      Delete
    2. I disagree with your opinion on the jones not starting over. They are obviously are in need of money at the certain point in time. If they know that they can be successful in this department and they have a good reputation after they proved the CIFA wrong I believe they could have a good rebuild.

      Delete
  4. In this situation, I believe that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is at fault. I would like to know what prompted them to halt production of Peninsula Farm. Their business suffered a loss of $100,000 and ultimately shut down and there was never any evidence presented to justify their actions. I do understand that the CFIA needs to be thorough but I feel that they should compensate the Jones family for their loss and restructure their investigation techniques in order to complete their analysis more efficiently. Smaller businesses obviously require an inspection that won’t compromise their business during the investigation process. Peninsula farms had an excellent record, and I feel this should have played a role in the investigation.
    I would definitely support special rules and a fixed timeline to protect the smaller business during the examination process. In a situation where no incidence of sickness have been reported, I feel that the business should be allowed to continue to ship out stock or refrigeration should be supplied to protect the inventory. Timeline is the main issue, therefore, it’s a matter of having more CFIA investigators on hand to speed up the process.
    Unless a massive overhaul of the investigation process took place, I would not rebuild my business because the same loss could happen again. Financially, it would be almost impossible to get back to where you were prior to the CFIA interruption unless you have unlimited funds. Although there are risks in any business, if the government wants to encourage small business owners to support the economy, they need to find a balance between protecting the public from harmful products and supporting and protecting the small business owner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you that the CFIA was at fault in this situation and that it would be fair for the Joneses to be compensated for what they lost. You also discussed the CFIA needing to restructure their investigation techniques to be more efficient, do you think that if that was done there would still be incidents like this case occurring every once in awhile simply due to people not doing their jobs properly?

      Delete
    2. I have to disagree with your opinion of the Joneses' not starting over. What makes you think that a repeat of the situation is possible? To me, it has less of a chance of recurring. The Joneses would have higher precautions and the CIFA would be made aware of their mishap in their investigation. Also, the article didn't specify wether it would be difficult for the company financially since they didn't state any profits. However, I do agree with your point verifying that there should be special rules for smaller businesses as it is more difficult for them to prosper.

      Delete
  5. Do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?
    Yes, I believe that the CFIA was being too diligent in this case. The Joneses did regularly exceed the government standards for hygiene and never had any health issues in the past and I think that the CFIA acted a little bit too fast based on the cursory examination leading them to a hasty decision. However, I also think that it was good that the CFIA was trying to protect people from any sickness and that´s part of their job, even though the yogurt was clean and didn't have any bacteria.
    The CFIA should've taken more time to examine the yogurt because at the end it was fine and the Peninsula Farms with such a loss was forced out of the market and probably left the family without any money or resources.

    Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?
    No, I don't think there should be any special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in the businesses. I believe that health and safety are first. No one wants to get sick by a mistake that the factory might had. I do believe that if someone is going to examine the products should do it with calm, before they take any decision that might affect a whole family and at the end that decision was a mistake. However, even if it is a small business health and safety issues should come first.

    If you were the Joneses, would you start over? Explain your decision.
    If I was the Joneses, I would not start over. I think that starting over would be even more expensive. I believe that they would probably have another chance to get a new job. Sonia Joneses was a Harvard graduate, she could probably get a really good job as a Spanish literature teacher, thing that she really love and really would enjoy teaching. Gordon Joneses was already retired as a management consultant. A reason for the family to move to Nova Scotia was because Mr. Joneses wanted to sail, thing that he wouldn't have enough time to do if he was running a business.
    If I was the Joneses, I would not start over because I would like to do something that I really enjoy, and I'm not saying that they didn't enjoy having Peninsula Farms but, after having a factory that really needs time, I would like to do something more relaxing and enjoy my life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too believe that health and safety should always come first because I think that’s more important than a company, no matter the size, making money. However, do you think that there is a line that the CFIA could cross where they are too diligent again even if they are just thinking about the consumers safety?

      Delete
    2. Keeping customers safe is prior to anything else, which I am totally agreed with. However, don't you believe CFIA can adapt new procedures which both satisfy the company and the consumers? I believe a win-win situation could be the best.

      Delete
  6. No, I don’t believe that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case. Everyone makes mistakes once in awhile, and it’s just an unfortunate coincidence that it was Peninsula Farms affected. However, I believe that in most cases they’re correct in what they do, and our health should be the first priority.

    I don’t that there should be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford this interruption in their businesses. In fact, if anything the rules for small ventures should be more strict- as companies that have established their names are more likely to have foods pass the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s requirements for food. Again, our health should be higher in importance than the well-being of a company, although that

    If I were the Joneses, I would start over. It would mean using up much more resources, and a bit of loss initially, but in the long run I think that it’d be worth it. There’s a much smaller chance that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency would make a mistake the second time, and it’s a business opportunity as well!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your statement that there should not be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford interruptions like this in their businesses. I believe that health and safety comes first and no special rules should be applied against that.

      Delete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. CIFA is diligent in their efforts on our behalf. However, in this case, do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?

    I do agree with the fact that all company's products should be examined on a regular basis. But in this case CIFA was way too diligent in this case, a penalty that scale should only be awarded in extreme cases and if the product is damaging the health of others. As it said in the text the company had no past of being unsanitary. So the CIFA had a way too hard of a penalty for a company that out of the blue was unsanitary. But I do understand the concern of the CIFA and if a company that produces a large amount of product for many people they have to think fast and do what they need to do. But to conclude the-the CIFA was way too diligent in this case and the penalty should not be that large in that case.

    Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?

    When CIFA is able to impound $50,000 of a product without being the question that is a very large problem. There obviously should be rules put in place that restrict the penalty that CIFA can award depending on the demand of the company and how unsanitary the product is.I find it quite sad that CIFA can damage a company to the point of bankruptcy without even having proof of the unsanitary product. As it said in the text the yogurt was later on proven that it was sanitary, which means that the decision was a mistake so there also should be rules that slower the process and make it accurate. So I believe that CIFA really does need to improve most aspects of their company to make more accurate penalties and decisions.

    If you were the Joneses, would you start over? Explain your decision.

    If I was Joneses I would start over after it was proved that my product was sanitary. Due to the fact that they already had the reputation of good yogurt so, I believe that they would be able to rebuild the company quite quickly. Both of them had a very strong education and a Harvard education should not be put to waste. So with their experience and good education, I think they can get a good fresh start and build the company better than ever. This time, they will have the experience with the mistakes they made and they can prevent being penalised by CIFA this time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CFIA should improve their inspection process as it could potentially ruin a business. However, I don't believe they were "too diligent" because it was just a normal practice. What they need to change is how but not how often they inspect businesses.

      Delete
  9. Canadians are grateful that the CIFA is diligent in their efforts on our behalf. However, in this case, do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?
    Yes, I believe they took matters in this case too diligently. Any small and successful business like Peninsula Farms is vulnerable in the health department. Safety regulations especially with food are taken very seriously and to extreme precaution. I feel that in this case, the CIFA were in the wrong impounding $50,000 worth of product and leaving this small business at a $100,000 deficit. The company exceeded expectations and regulations on regular inspections and the article didn’t specifically state why the CIFA impounded their product and what regulation wasn’t met. The CIFA made a mistake which in turn demolished the business, ruined reputation and potentially could have put the Joneses in a hole of debt if they didn’t have other jobs to fall back on. This is a huge mistake by the CIFA and knowing afterwards that their plant was above standard and yogurt tested clean, I feel the CIFA needs to rethink their strategy. Small business are needed in their local areas and have high consumer demand. Companies like CISCO are dominating the food industry and dealing products to hospitals, cafeterias and restaurants. Having the option of healthy natural food is needed and this little mistake could have ruined a very successful business.

    Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?
    I do believe that there should be different protocols for smaller home-grown businesses and should not receive the same treatment as large companies. Smaller businesses are much more vulnerable and can crash at any moment. I feel we should be supporting these businesses more and creating new regulations is a step in the right direction. Large companies can fall back comfortably on excess revenue and restart or remodel their product or service. As I said, small companies are weak and don’t have that safety option. Putting the Peninsula Farms $100,000 in the hole and impounded a sufficient amount of income is devastating.

    If you were the Joneses, would you start over? Explain your decision.
    Yes, of course I would start over. Peninsula Farms is a reputable business with fame and recognition. They started from the bottom and they were on their way to the top. It is unclear if the owners contain enough revenue from the project to finance a rebirth of the company but it would be ideal if they did. The same situation won’t happen again regarding the CIFA. The yogurt tested healthy and clean and the CIFA should be made aware of that. Release the information publicly and consumers won’t be impacted by the mishap. This company had huge potential and why ruin it by a false safety regulation. The Joneses have two daughters and knowing how much this company grew, it would be safe to say that this company could be passed down for generations.

    ReplyDelete
  10. However, in this case, do you believe the Canadian Food Inspection Agency was too diligent in this case?
    Yes I do believe that the CFIA was too diligent in this case because the agency is not supposed to make the people lose their jobs, they are supposed to help them see what is wrong and what is right. In this case the whole business broke down and the people lost their jobs. Which is clearly not fair since the yogurt was clean in the end. CFIA should assist consumers of course but should also cooperate with the producers. Both sides should profit from the work of this agency. The agency is not there to punish, but to make things better for everyone.

    Should there be special rules for small ventures that cannot afford such an interruption in their businesses?
    There shouldn’t be any special rules, because it’s too difficult to create a special set of rules for so many different businesses. But what they could do is to be more flexible with smaller businesses. They could be proactive and help and cooperate better with smaller businesses who don’t have the same means as bigger businesses.

    If you were the Joneses, would you start over? Explain your decision.
    If I was the Joneses I would restart the business even though it would be depressing to have lost everything and to restart from zero again. But it would be worth it, since now they would know how the business works and what they would have to do. This time however they should collaborate right from the beginning with CFIA and even take the initiative to invite them over for inspection. Because of this they could avoid to have a sudden inspection so that they wouldn’t have to stop their business altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Very nice post here and thanks for it .I always like and such a super contents of these post.Excellent and very cool idea and great content of different kinds of the valuable information's.
    Selenium Online training | Selenium Certification Online course-Gangboard

    Selenium interview questions and answers

    Selenium interview questions and answers

    Selenium Online training | Selenium Certification Online course

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for the informative article. This is one of the best resources I have found in quite some time. Nicely written and great info. I really cannot thank you enough for sharing.

    Best Devops training in sholinganallur
    Devops training in velachery
    Devops training in annanagar
    Devops training in tambaram

    ReplyDelete
  13. This blog is the general information for the feature. You got a good work for these blog.We have a developing our creative content of this mind.Thank you for this blog. This for very interesting and useful.
    Data Science Training in Indira nagar
    Data Science Training in btm layout
    Python Training in Kalyan nagar
    Data Science training in Indira nagar
    Data Science Training in Marathahalli | Data Science training in Bangalore

    ReplyDelete